Skip to main content

EMA director has issues with audit

Lead Summary

The local attention given to the recent Iowa State Auditor’s report on Chickasaw County -- which was released in November -- was a lot like those old fast-food commercials.
At first glance, it looked like there was a great big cheeseburger on your tray, but when you opened the bun for a closer look, there was hardly any meat there at all.
At least that’s the opinion of Austen Seely, the county’s Emergency Management Agency (EMA) director.
The state auditors combed through over two years of expenditures for Chickasaw County, and although there were some clear procedural discrepancies in some departments that need to be addressed, the auditors found just over $1,500 of questionable expenses in a budget that’s in the tens of millions of dollars. 
Essentially, there’s not much beef there at all, and many county employees, taxpayers and department heads have been left wondering why the re-audit was suggested in the first place.
Seely believes his department was unfairly singled out in the audit, and doesn’t appreciate the negative publicity EMA has received.
“The details in the audit made us look bad, when those expenditures are taken out of context,” Seely said. “It’s already making an impact on the people who work for us.”

*/

Several county department heads have conducted investigations within their own departments. Seely, for example, prepared a 17-page report in December and presented it to the supervisors, the county attorney, and to other county officials and the public. 
 
For more of this article, see Tuesday's Tribune.

Thank you for reading!

To read the full version of all available articles, you must be a subscriber to the New Hampton Tribune's website. To become a subscriber, please click here to be taken to our subscription page. If you already are a subscriber, please click here to login to the site and continue reading. Thank you.